Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Parental and provider vaccine hesitancy and non-timely childhood vaccination in Switzerland

Jafflin, Kristen; Deml, Michael J; Schwendener, Corina L; Kiener, Laura; Delfino, Alexandre; Gafner, Rebecca; Schudel, Sophie; Mäusezahl, Mirjam; Berger, Christoph; Huber, Benedikt M; Merten, Sonja; Tarr, Philip E (2022). Parental and provider vaccine hesitancy and non-timely childhood vaccination in Switzerland. Vaccine, 40(23):3193-3202.

Abstract

Objective

Although medical providers are a trusted vaccination information source for parents, they do not universally support vaccination. Complementary medicine (CM) providers are particularly likely to hold vaccine hesitant (VH) views, and VH parents often consult with them. Little research compares VH of parents and providers, and if and how each is associated with uptake of recommended childhood vaccines.
Methods

We defined non-timely receipt as recommended vaccines given > 1 month later than officially recommended, based on vaccination records. We administered versions of the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) 5-item survey instrument to 1256 parents and their children’s pediatricians (N = 112, 40 CM-oriented, 72 biomedical [not CM-oriented]) to identify moderately (PACV-score 5–6) and highly (PACV-score 7+) hesitant providers/parents. We obtained multivariable adjusted odds ratios to test relationships between parental VH and provider type/VH, and between non-timely receipt of selected childhood vaccines and parental VH and provider type/VH.
Results

No biomedical providers were VH, 9 CM providers were moderately VH, and 17 were highly VH. Parents seeing moderately and highly hesitant providers had adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for being VH = 6.6 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.1–14.0) and AOR = 31.3 (95% CI 16.8–58.3), respectively. Across all vaccine uptake endpoints, children of moderately and highly hesitant parents had 1.9–3.8 and 7.1–12.3 higher odds of non-timely vaccination, and children seeing highly hesitant CM providers had 4.9–9.4 higher odds. Children seeing moderately hesitant CM providers had 3.3 higher odds of non-timely vaccination for the 1st dose of measles and 3.5 higher odds for 1st dose of polio/pertussis/tetanus.
Conclusion

VH by both parents and providers each is associated with non-timely childhood vaccination. As VH parents are more likely to consult with VH providers, interventions aimed at increasing timely vaccination need to primarily target VH providers and their clients.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Medical Clinic
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Life Sciences > Molecular Medicine
Life Sciences > General Immunology and Microbiology
Health Sciences > General Veterinary
Health Sciences > Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health Sciences > Infectious Diseases
Uncontrolled Keywords:Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Veterinary, General Immunology and Microbiology, Molecular Medicine
Language:English
Date:1 May 2022
Deposited On:09 Nov 2022 10:52
Last Modified:28 Aug 2024 01:37
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0264-410X
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.044
PubMed ID:35487812
Full text not available from this repository.

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
9 citations in Web of Science®
9 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications