Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment by SCORE2 Predicts Risk for Colorectal Neoplasia and Tumor-Related Mortality


Wernly, Sarah; Semmler, Georg; Völkerer, Andreas; Rezar, Richard; Datz, Leonora; Radzikowski, Konrad; Stickel, Felix; Aigner, Elmar; Niederseer, David; Wernly, Bernhard; Datz, Christian (2022). Cardiovascular Risk Assessment by SCORE2 Predicts Risk for Colorectal Neoplasia and Tumor-Related Mortality. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(5):848.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The European Society of Cardiology endorsed SCORE2 to assess cardiovascular risk. The aim of this observational, retrospective study was to assess whether SCORE2 is associated with colorectal neoplasia in an asymptomatic screening population. Further, we evaluated if SCORE2 predicts tumor-related mortality.

METHODS

We included 3408 asymptomatic patients who underwent a screening colonoscopy. We calculated SCORE2 for each participant and stratified patients according to their predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: SCORE2 0-4.9%, SCORE2 5-9.9%, and SCORE2 ≥ 10%. We assessed the association between SCORE2 as a continuous variable, the presence of colorectal neoplasia using multilevel logistic regression, and SCORE2 and mortality using Cox regression.

RESULTS

In total, 1537 patients had a SCORE2 of 0-4.9%, 1235 a SCORE2 of 5-9.9%, and 636 a SCORE2 ≥ 10%. The respective rates of colorectal neoplasia were 20%, 37%, and 44%. SCORE2 was associated with the presence of any (OR 1.11 95%CI 1.09-1.12; p < 0.001) and advanced colorectal neoplasia (OR 1.06 95%CI 1.08-1.13; p < 0.001) in univariate analysis. After multivariable adjustment (age, sex, family history, and metabolic syndrome) a higher SCORE2 remained associated with higher odds for any (aOR 1.04 95%CI 1.02-1.06; p = 0.001) and advanced (aOR 1.06 95%CI 1.03-1.10; p < 0.001) colorectal neoplasia. SCORE2 was associated with both all-cause (HR 1.11 95%CI 1.09-1.14; p < 0.001) and tumor-related mortality (HR 1.10 95%CI 1.05-1.14; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that SCORE2 is associated with the presence of colorectal neoplasia. Clinicians could kill two birds with one stone calculating SCORE2. In patients with a high SCORE2, screening colonoscopy aside from cardiovascular risk mitigation could improve outcomes.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The European Society of Cardiology endorsed SCORE2 to assess cardiovascular risk. The aim of this observational, retrospective study was to assess whether SCORE2 is associated with colorectal neoplasia in an asymptomatic screening population. Further, we evaluated if SCORE2 predicts tumor-related mortality.

METHODS

We included 3408 asymptomatic patients who underwent a screening colonoscopy. We calculated SCORE2 for each participant and stratified patients according to their predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: SCORE2 0-4.9%, SCORE2 5-9.9%, and SCORE2 ≥ 10%. We assessed the association between SCORE2 as a continuous variable, the presence of colorectal neoplasia using multilevel logistic regression, and SCORE2 and mortality using Cox regression.

RESULTS

In total, 1537 patients had a SCORE2 of 0-4.9%, 1235 a SCORE2 of 5-9.9%, and 636 a SCORE2 ≥ 10%. The respective rates of colorectal neoplasia were 20%, 37%, and 44%. SCORE2 was associated with the presence of any (OR 1.11 95%CI 1.09-1.12; p < 0.001) and advanced colorectal neoplasia (OR 1.06 95%CI 1.08-1.13; p < 0.001) in univariate analysis. After multivariable adjustment (age, sex, family history, and metabolic syndrome) a higher SCORE2 remained associated with higher odds for any (aOR 1.04 95%CI 1.02-1.06; p = 0.001) and advanced (aOR 1.06 95%CI 1.03-1.10; p < 0.001) colorectal neoplasia. SCORE2 was associated with both all-cause (HR 1.11 95%CI 1.09-1.14; p < 0.001) and tumor-related mortality (HR 1.10 95%CI 1.05-1.14; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that SCORE2 is associated with the presence of colorectal neoplasia. Clinicians could kill two birds with one stone calculating SCORE2. In patients with a high SCORE2, screening colonoscopy aside from cardiovascular risk mitigation could improve outcomes.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Downloads

2 downloads since deposited on 07 Feb 2023
2 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Medicine (miscellaneous)
Language:English
Date:23 May 2022
Deposited On:07 Feb 2023 13:09
Last Modified:02 Mar 2023 14:08
Publisher:MDPI Publishing
ISSN:2075-4426
OA Status:Gold
Free access at:PubMed ID. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050848
PubMed ID:35629269
  • Content: Published Version
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)