Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Analysis of feline humeral fracture morphology and a comparison of fracture repair stabilisation methods: 101 cases (2009–2020)

Gall, Nick; Parsons, Kevin; Radke, Heidi; Comerford, Eithne; Mielke, Ben; Grierson, James; Ryan, John; Addison, Elena; Logethelou, Vasileia; Blaszyk, Agnieszka; Langley-Hobbs, Sorrel J (2022). Analysis of feline humeral fracture morphology and a comparison of fracture repair stabilisation methods: 101 cases (2009–2020). Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 24(6):e19-e27.

Abstract

Objectives The aims of this study were to describe the type, presentation and prognostic factors of feline humeral fractures over a 10-year period and to compare three stabilisation systems for feline humeral diaphyseal fractures. Methods In total, 101 cats with humeral fractures presenting to seven UK referral centres between 2009 and 2020 were reviewed. Data collected included signalment, weight at the time of surgery, fracture aetiology, preoperative presentation, fixation method, surgical details, perioperative management and follow-up examinations. Of these cases, 57 cats with humeral diaphyseal fractures stabilised using three different fixation methods were compared, with outcome parameters including the time to radiographic healing, time to function and complication rate. Results The majority of the fractures were diaphyseal (71%), with only 10% condylar. Of the known causes of fracture, road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the most common. Neutered males were over-represented in having a fracture caused by an RTA ( P = 0.001) and diaphyseal fractures were significantly more likely to result from an RTA ( P = 0.01). Body weight had a positive correlation ( r = 0.398) with time to radiographic healing and time to acceptable function ( r = 0.315), and was significant ( P = 0.014 and P = 0.037, respectively). Of the 57 humeral diaphyseal fractures; 16 (28%) were stabilised using a plate–rod construct, 31 (54%) using external skeletal fixation and 10 (18%) using bone plating and screws only. Open diaphyseal fractures were associated with more minor complications ( P = 0.048). There was a significant difference between fixation groups in terms of overall complication rate between groups ( P = 0.012). There was no significant difference between fixation groups in time to radiographic union ( P = 0.145) or time to acceptable function ( P = 0.306). Conclusions and relevance All three fixation systems were successful in healing a wide variety of humeral diaphyseal fractures. There was a significantly higher overall complication rate with external skeletal fixators compared with bone plating; however, the clinical impact of these is likely low.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Department of Small Animals
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
630 Agriculture
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Small Animals
Uncontrolled Keywords:Small Animals
Language:English
Date:1 June 2022
Deposited On:16 Feb 2023 17:57
Last Modified:23 Mar 2025 04:37
Publisher:Sage Publications
ISSN:1098-612X
OA Status:Green
Free access at:PubMed ID. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x221080600
PubMed ID:35254143
Download PDF  'Analysis of feline humeral fracture morphology and a comparison of fracture repair stabilisation methods: 101 cases (2009–2020)'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Language: English
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
4 citations in Web of Science®
4 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

25 downloads since deposited on 16 Feb 2023
7 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications