Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch
Lewandowsky, S; Oberauer, Klaus; Brown, G (2009). Response to Barrouillet and Camos: Interference or decay in working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4):146-147.
Barrouillet and Camos raise three objections to our conclusion that short-term forgetting is caused by interference rather than decay [1]. They suggest (i) that interference models are ‘vague’, (ii) that considering forgetting as a function of delay is questionable and (iii) that the timebased resource-sharing (TBRS) model is not challenged by the data we cited. We believe that these objections do not withstand scrutiny.
| Item Type: | Journal Article, refereed, original work |
|---|---|
| Communities & Collections: | 06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology |
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 150 Psychology |
| Scopus Subject Areas: | Social Sciences & Humanities > Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Social Sciences & Humanities > Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Life Sciences > Cognitive Neuroscience |
| Language: | English |
| Date: | March 2009 |
| Deposited On: | 21 Oct 2009 10:23 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Mar 2025 02:39 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 1364-6613 |
| OA Status: | Closed |
| Publisher DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.003 |
Lewandowsky, S