Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections

Flamino, James; Galeazzi, Alessandro; Feldman, Stuart; Macy, Michael W; Cross, Brendan; Zhou, Zhenkun; Serafino, Matteo; Bovet, Alexandre; Makse, Hernán A; Szymanski, Boleslaw K (2023). Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(6):904-916.

Abstract

Social media has been transforming political communication dynamics for over a decade. Here using nearly a billion tweets, we analyse the change in Twitter’s news media landscape between the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. Using political bias and fact-checking tools, we measure the volume of politically biased content and the number of users propagating such information. We then identify influencers—users with the greatest ability to spread news in the Twitter network. We observe that the fraction of fake and extremely biased content declined between 2016 and 2020. However, results show increasing echo chamber behaviours and latent ideological polarization across the two elections at the user and influencer levels.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Mathematics
08 Research Priority Programs > Digital Society Initiative
Dewey Decimal Classification:510 Mathematics
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Social Psychology
Social Sciences & Humanities > Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Life Sciences > Behavioral Neuroscience
Uncontrolled Keywords:Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
Language:English
Date:13 March 2023
Deposited On:29 Jun 2023 09:13
Last Modified:29 Dec 2024 02:38
Publisher:Nature Publishing Group
ISSN:2397-3374
Additional Information:Funding text J.F., B.C. and B.K.S. were partially supported by DARPA-INCAS under Agreement No. HR001121C0165 and by NSF Grant No. BSE-2214216. H.A.M. was supported by NSF Grant No. BSE-2214217. Z.Z. was supported by the R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission, Grant No. KM202210038002. M.W.M. was partially supported by NSF Grant No. SES-2049207. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Supplementary Text Definitions of Polarization We acknowledge that political scientists distinguish multiple types of polarization [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44]: affective polarization (the penchant for one partisan political group to experience animus toward an opposing partisan group), policy polarization (extreme differences of opinion on highly salient issues), partisan polarization (a substantive and affective division based on identification with opposing political parties), ideological polarization (a substantive and affective division based on identification with opposing ideological camps, e.g., liberals versus conservatives), and geographic polarization (the regional alignment of opinions, e.g., “red state/blue state”). Furthermore, each of these five types of polarization can, in turn, be classified by level: elite polarization among political officials and pundits, media polarization among news organizations, and voter polarization among the underlying population as usually measured by exit polls and opinion surveys. In the main manuscript, we seek to explore polarization to quantify the various ways the Twitter communities disseminate news. Accordingly, we opt to define polarization in the main manuscript as the growth in ideological separation between Twitter users as characterized by the political alignment of the content they propagate. Supplementary Information: Supplementary text, figs. 1–10 and tables 1–10. https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41562-023-01550-8/MediaObjects/41562_2023_1550_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
OA Status:Hybrid
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01550-8
PubMed ID:36914806
Project Information:
  • Funder: DARPA-INCAS
  • Grant ID: HR001121C0165
  • Project Title:
  • Funder: National Science Foundation
  • Grant ID: BSE-2214216
  • Project Title:
  • Funder: National Science Foundation
  • Grant ID: BSE-2214217
  • Project Title:
  • Funder: Beijing Municipal Commission of Education
  • Grant ID: KM202210038002
  • Project Title:
  • Funder: Beijing Municipal Commission of Education
  • Grant ID: SES-2049207
  • Project Title:
Download PDF  'Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Language: English
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
28 citations in Web of Science®
35 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

41 downloads since deposited on 29 Jun 2023
33 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications