Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Indwelling catheter vs intermittent catheterization: is there a difference in UTI susceptibility?

Neumeier, Vera; Stangl, Fabian P; Borer, Joëlle; Anderson, Collene E; Birkhäuser, Veronika; Chemych, Oksana; Gross, Oliver; Koschorke, Miriam; Marschall, Jonas; McCallin, Shawna; Mehnert, Ulrich; Sadri, Helen; Stächele, Lara; Kessler, Thomas M; Leitner, Lorenz (2023). Indwelling catheter vs intermittent catheterization: is there a difference in UTI susceptibility? BMC Infectious Diseases, 23(1):507.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) often rely on some type of catheterization for bladder emptying. Intermittent catheterization (IC) is considered the gold standard and is preferred over continuous catheterization, since it is considered to cause fewer urinary tract infections (UTIs) than indwelling catheterization. The main objective of our study was to describe UTI prevalence (at visit) and incidence (within the last 12 months) and urine culture characteristics between patients using an indwelling catheter versus (vs) those performing IC.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we prospectively evaluated from 02/2020 to 01/2021 patients with NLUTD undergoing urine cultures for prophylactic reasons or due to UTI symptoms. At visit, all patients underwent a standardized interview on current UTI symptoms as well as UTI history and antibiotic consumption within the past year. Patients using an indwelling catheter (n = 206) or IC (n = 299) were included in the analysis. The main outcome was between-group differences regarding UTI characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients using an indwelling catheter were older (indwelling catheter vs IC: median 66 (Q1-Q3: 55-77) vs 55 (42-67) years of age) and showed a higher Charlson comorbidity index (indwelling catheter vs IC: median 4 (Q1-Q3: 2-6) vs 2 (1-4) (both p < 0·001). A total of 40 patients from both groups were diagnosed with a UTI at visit (indwelling catheters vs IC: 8% (16/206) vs 8% (24/299); p = 0·782), and the number of UTIs within the past 12 months was not significantly different between groups. Overall, Escherichia coli (21%), Enterococcus faecalis (17%), and Klebsiella spp. (12%) were the most frequently detected bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with NLUTD, we did not find relevant differences in UTI frequency between groups. These results suggest that UTI-related concerns should not be given undue emphasis when counseling patients for catheter-related bladder emptying methods.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Urological Clinic
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Infectious Diseases
Language:English
Date:2 August 2023
Deposited On:15 Sep 2023 06:59
Last Modified:28 Apr 2025 01:35
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN:1471-2334
OA Status:Gold
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08475-7
PubMed ID:37533010
Other Identification Number:PMCID: PMC10398982
Download PDF  'Indwelling catheter vs intermittent catheterization: is there a difference in UTI susceptibility?'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Language: English
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
2 citations in Web of Science®
3 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

6 downloads since deposited on 15 Sep 2023
4 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications