Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples

Koliwer‐Brandl, Hendrik; Nil, Ahmed; Birri, Jana; Sachs, Maike; Zimmermann, Roland; Zbinden, Reinhard; Balsyte, Dalia (2023). Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 102(4):450-456.

Abstract

IntroductionStreptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B streptococci (GBS), is associated with invasive infections in neonates. Identification of GBS vaginal colonization in pregnant women before delivery is essential for treatment with antibiotics to prevent intrapartum vertical transmission to the newborn. This study was designed to evaluate applicability of two rapid real‐time PCRs in comparison to standard culture identification.Material and methodsWe compared the Xpert GBS assay, hereafter referred to as Xpert, and GenomEra GBS PCR, hereafter referred to as GenomEra. The standard culture identification consisted of two different agar plates as well as an enrichment broth.ResultsWe analyzed vaginal samples of 260 pregnant women; 42 samples were tested GBS‐positive by using standard culture as a gold standard, 30 by Xpert, and 37 by GenomEra. Xpert and GenomEra assays performed with sensitivities of 71.4% and 88.1% as well as specificities of 98.6% and 99.1%, respectively. Twelve vaginal samples were false‐negative by Xpert and five samples by GenomEra. Interestingly, three negative Xpert results of standard culture‐positive samples exhibited high Ct‐values indicating the presence of GBS. If higher Ct‐values are taken into consideration, the sensitivity of Xpert increases up to 78.6%. Moreover, only three Xpert PCRs had to be repeated, whereas two Genomera were invalid even after repetition and further 15 GenomEra PCRs were repeated because of borderline results or inhibition of the PCR test.ConclusionsIn this study, GenomEra assay performed with a higher sensitivity than the Xpert PCR. On the other hand, the Xpert assay needs less hands‐on‐time for a sample preparation and requires approximately four‐fold less repetitions as compared to the GenomEra assay. This robust performance of the Xpert assay make it applicable as a rapid intrapartum point‐of‐care test, although a higher sensitivity would be desirable. Therefore, culture in the 35–37 week of gestation remains the gold standard to detect vaginal colonization.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Obstetrics
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Medical Microbiology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Obstetrics and Gynecology
Uncontrolled Keywords:Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Medicine
Language:English
Date:1 April 2023
Deposited On:24 Oct 2023 15:04
Last Modified:30 Dec 2024 02:50
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN:0001-6349
OA Status:Hybrid
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14519
PubMed ID:36772902
Download PDF  'Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Language: English
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
3 citations in Web of Science®
5 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

6 downloads since deposited on 24 Oct 2023
6 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications