Prosthodontic outcomes of mandibular overdenture treatment with one or two implants: 4‐year results of a randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Objective: To assess the incidence of prosthodontic maintenance events and complications during 4 years of follow‐up after mandibular overdenture treatment with one or two implants.
Methods: Participants received one or two implants inserted in the midline (1‐IOD group) or the lateral incisor‐canine area bilaterally (2‐IOD group). Implants were loaded with an early loading protocol after 3 weeks. Programmed recall visits were scheduled at the 6‐, 12‐, 36‐, and 48‐month follow‐ups and nonprogrammed visits in case of prosthodontic complaints. The type of maintenance was registered, and the final treatment outcome was classified as successful, surviving, unknown, dead, repair, or retreatment.
Results: Forty‐seven participants, mean age 65.4 ± 8.6, 74.5% female, were included (1‐IOD = 23; 2‐IOD = 24) and 44 completed the 4‐year follow‐up. A total of 159 prosthodontic maintenance events occurred and 89 in unscheduled visits. The most common event was the need for minor modifications of the denture base due to sore spots in the oral mucosa (n = 56 in 31 patients), matrix activation (n = 54 in 34 patients), and overdenture fracture (n = 25 in 18 patients). A “successful” or “surviving” outcome could be attributed to 57.5% of cases, whereas 38.3% needed repair. No significant differences in the incidence of prosthodontic events or treatment outcomes were found between the two groups.
Conclusions: Findings show that 1‐IODs perform similar to 2‐IODs when considering the incidence of fractures and the need for prosthodontic maintenance, including adjustments of the overdenture and the attachment system.