Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Impact of three different peak picking software tools on the quality of untargeted metabolomics data

Wartmann, Yannick; Boxler, Martina I; Kraemer, Thomas; Steuer, Andrea Eva (2024). Impact of three different peak picking software tools on the quality of untargeted metabolomics data. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 248:116302.

Abstract

Data quality and control parameters are becoming more important in metabolomics. For peak picking, open-source or commercial solutions are used. Other publications consider different software solutions or data acquisition types for peak picking, a combination, including proposed and new quality parameters for the process of peak picking, does not exist. This study tries to examine the performance of three different software in terms of reproducibility and quality of their output while also considering new quality parameters to gain a better understanding of resulting feature lists in metabolomics data. We saw best recovery of spiked analytes in MS-DIAL. Reproducibility over multiple projects was good among all software. The total number of features found was consistent for DDA and full scan acquisition in MS-DIAL but full scan data leading to considerably more features in MZmine and Progenesis Qi. Feature linearity proved to be a good quality parameter. Features in MS-DIAL and MZmine, showed good linearity while Progenesis Qi produced large variation, especially in full scan data. Peak width proved to be a very powerful filtering criteria revealing many features in MZmine and Progenesis Qi to be of questionable peak width. Additionally, full scan data appears to produce a disproportionally higher number of short features. This parameter is not yet available in MS-DIAL. Finally, the manual classification of true positive features proved MS-DIAL to perform significantly better in DDA data (62 % true positive) than the two other software in either mode. We showed that currently popular solutions MS-DIAL and MZmine perform well in targeted analysis of spiked analytes as well as in classic untargeted analysis. The commercially available solution Progenesis Qi does not hold any advantage over the two in terms of quality parameters, of which we proposed peak width as a new parameter and showed that already proposed parameters such as feature linearity in samples of increasing concentration are advisable to use.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Legal Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
340 Law
Scopus Subject Areas:Physical Sciences > Analytical Chemistry
Life Sciences > Pharmaceutical Science
Life Sciences > Drug Discovery
Physical Sciences > Spectroscopy
Life Sciences > Clinical Biochemistry
Uncontrolled Keywords:(Un)targeted metabolomics, LC-MS/MS, DDA, DIA, Comparison, MS-DIAL, MZmine
Language:English
Date:15 September 2024
Deposited On:02 Jul 2024 13:38
Last Modified:28 Feb 2025 02:35
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0731-7085
OA Status:Hybrid
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116302
PubMed ID:38865927
Download PDF  'Impact of three different peak picking software tools on the quality of untargeted metabolomics data'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Language: English
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

10 downloads since deposited on 02 Jul 2024
10 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications