Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Migration von ZORA auf die Software DSpace

ZORA will change to a new software on 8th September 2025. Please note: deadline for new submissions is 21th July 2025!

Information & dates for training courses can be found here: Information on Software Migration.

Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Pelvic Inclination Correction System: defining the normal range and threshold to pathology

Ghafoor, Soleen; Beintner-Skawran, Stephan; Betschart, Cornelia; Winklehner, Thomas; Reiner, Cäcilia S (2024). Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Pelvic Inclination Correction System: defining the normal range and threshold to pathology. Abdominal Radiology, 49(6):1996-2007.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define the normal range and threshold values for pathologic prolapse on MRI using the PICS line and assess its correlation with the pubococcygeal line (PCL). METHODS: This prospective, IRB-approved study included 20 nulliparous volunteers and 18 prolapse patients (POP-Q Stage ≥ 2). Organ positions (bladder, cervix, anorectal junction) relative to PICS and PCL were measured on dynamic MRI. Differences in organ position were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify cutoff values for prolapse using the PICS line. The correlation between PICS and PCL measurements was tested with Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: In volunteers, median bladder and cervix positions measured to the PICS at rest were - 2.7 cm and - 5.3 cm compared to - 1.9 cm and - 2.7 cm in patients (p < 0.001). During straining, bladder and cervix were at - 0.9 cm and - 3.2 cm in volunteers versus + 2.5 cm and + 2.5 cm in patients (p < 0.001). Correlation was strong for PICS and PCL measurements for all three compartments (δ = 0.883-0.970, p ≤ 0.001). AUCs of PICS for the anterior and middle compartment were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.00, p < 0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.89-1.00, p < 0.001) for differentiating patients from healthy volunteers. AUC for the posterior compartment was 0.76 (95% CI 0.57-0.96, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: PICS measurements reliably differentiate patients from volunteers in the anterior and middle compartment. Future studies need to identify a reliable threshold for the posterior compartment. PICS and PCL measurements are strongly correlated.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Gynecology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Health Sciences > Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Health Sciences > Gastroenterology
Health Sciences > Urology
Uncontrolled Keywords:Diagnostic imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pelvic floor disorders; Pelvic organ prolapse
Language:English
Date:June 2024
Deposited On:29 Jul 2024 13:05
Last Modified:29 Jun 2025 01:37
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:2366-004X
OA Status:Hybrid
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04222-x
PubMed ID:38480546
Download PDF  'Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Pelvic Inclination Correction System: defining the normal range and threshold to pathology'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Language: English
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
2 citations in Web of Science®
2 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

5 downloads since deposited on 29 Jul 2024
5 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications