Investigating heterogeneity in IRTree models for multiple response processes with score‐based partitioning

Abstract

Item response tree (IRTree) models form a family of psychometric models that allow researchers to control for multiple response processes, such as different sorts of response styles, in the measurement of latent traits. While IRTree models can capture quantitative individual differences in both the latent traits of interest and the use of response categories, they maintain the basic assumption that the nature and weighting of latent response processes are homogeneous across the entire population of respondents. In the present research, we therefore propose a novel approach for detecting heterogeneity in the parameters of IRTree models across subgroups that engage in different response behavior. The approach uses score‐based tests to reveal violations of parameter heterogeneity along extraneous person covariates, and it can be employed as a model‐based partitioning algorithm to identify sources of differences in the strength of trait‐based responding or other response processes. Simulation studies demonstrate generally accurate Type I error rates and sufficient power for metric, ordinal, and categorical person covariates and for different types of test statistics, with the potential to differentiate between different types of parameter heterogeneity. An empirical application illustrates the use of score‐based partitioning in the analysis of latent response processes with real data.