Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Endoscopic management of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and enucleation


Goasguen, N; Bourrier, A; Ponsot, P; Bastien, L; Lesurtel, M; Prat, F; Dousset, B; Sauvanet, A (2009). Endoscopic management of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and enucleation. American Journal of Surgery, 197(6):715-720.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS) has been proposed to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) or enucleation (EN). The use of EPS as a curative treatment for POPF has been scarcely reported. We reported 10 consecutive patients who were successfully treated by EPS for a prolonged POPF. STUDY DESIGN: Ten patients underwent EPS for prolonged POPF (median duration = 40 days, range 20-114; median daily output = 80 mL, range 50-250) after 6 DPs, 2 ENs, and 2 medial pancreatectomies. RESULTS: EPS was performed in all patients, with stent insertion in 4. No patient developed a specific complication because of EPS. POPF healed within a median delay of 4 days (range 1-12). One patient underwent a repeated endoscopy to treat stent malposition. The median delay of discharge after EPS was 13 days (range 8-15). With a 20-month median follow up, 1 patient developed early transient POPF recurrence because of spontaneous stent migration. CONCLUSIONS: EPS is indicated for prolonged POPF after DP or EN because it is highly feasible, shortens healing, and is well tolerated.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS) has been proposed to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) or enucleation (EN). The use of EPS as a curative treatment for POPF has been scarcely reported. We reported 10 consecutive patients who were successfully treated by EPS for a prolonged POPF. STUDY DESIGN: Ten patients underwent EPS for prolonged POPF (median duration = 40 days, range 20-114; median daily output = 80 mL, range 50-250) after 6 DPs, 2 ENs, and 2 medial pancreatectomies. RESULTS: EPS was performed in all patients, with stent insertion in 4. No patient developed a specific complication because of EPS. POPF healed within a median delay of 4 days (range 1-12). One patient underwent a repeated endoscopy to treat stent malposition. The median delay of discharge after EPS was 13 days (range 8-15). With a 20-month median follow up, 1 patient developed early transient POPF recurrence because of spontaneous stent migration. CONCLUSIONS: EPS is indicated for prolonged POPF after DP or EN because it is highly feasible, shortens healing, and is well tolerated.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
13 citations in Web of Science®
17 citations in Scopus®
19 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:12 Mar 2010 12:39
Last Modified:18 Feb 2018 00:47
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0002-9610
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.005
PubMed ID:18789426

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

Get full-text in a library