Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Resource entitlement and mobility of pastoralists in the Yerer and Daketa Valleys, Eastern Ethiopia


Bogale, A; Korf, Benedikt (2009). Resource entitlement and mobility of pastoralists in the Yerer and Daketa Valleys, Eastern Ethiopia. Human Ecology, 37(4):453-462.

Abstract

Literature on the mobility of pastoralists and resource access is widely available, but conceptualization and understanding of the socioeconomic processes expected to affect the outcome are inconsistent. In this article, drawing on research conducted in the Yerer and Daketa Valleys, eastern Ethiopia, we use the notion of entitlements to examine how, under increasing pressure for resource access, various agro-pastoral households manage conflicting interests in common grazing resources. We observed that in times of drought and resource scarcity incumbent agro-pastoralists find peaceful sharing arrangements with intruding pastoralists. Asset-poor agro-pastoralists enter into mutually beneficial arrangements with pastoralists, trading their resource endow- ments to grazing land for other assets from the pastoralists, whereas wealthier households prefer a reciprocal risk- management strategy. These multiple arrangements have distributional effects because asset-poor agro-pastoralist households can stabilize or enhance their household assets and their capabilities in times of drought, and thus benefit from assisting pastoralist migrants to the common grazing land.

Abstract

Literature on the mobility of pastoralists and resource access is widely available, but conceptualization and understanding of the socioeconomic processes expected to affect the outcome are inconsistent. In this article, drawing on research conducted in the Yerer and Daketa Valleys, eastern Ethiopia, we use the notion of entitlements to examine how, under increasing pressure for resource access, various agro-pastoral households manage conflicting interests in common grazing resources. We observed that in times of drought and resource scarcity incumbent agro-pastoralists find peaceful sharing arrangements with intruding pastoralists. Asset-poor agro-pastoralists enter into mutually beneficial arrangements with pastoralists, trading their resource endow- ments to grazing land for other assets from the pastoralists, whereas wealthier households prefer a reciprocal risk- management strategy. These multiple arrangements have distributional effects because asset-poor agro-pastoralist households can stabilize or enhance their household assets and their capabilities in times of drought, and thus benefit from assisting pastoralist migrants to the common grazing land.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
3 citations in Web of Science®
5 citations in Scopus®
4 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

3 downloads since deposited on 12 Mar 2010
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
Dewey Decimal Classification:910 Geography & travel
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:12 Mar 2010 12:17
Last Modified:18 Feb 2018 00:47
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0300-7839
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9236-3

Download