Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again?


Brockmann-Bauser, M; Drinnan, M J (2011). Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again? Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 19(3):165-70.

Abstract

The validity of acoustic assessments in clinical applications remains unproven. Measurement reliability is still limited and might be greatly improved with relatively simple changes and consensus in measurement protocols and techniques. For instance, clinical assessment procedures and current normative values would have to be revised considering gender and vowel. Thus, future research might establish the validity and potential of clinical acoustic assessments.

Abstract

The validity of acoustic assessments in clinical applications remains unproven. Measurement reliability is still limited and might be greatly improved with relatively simple changes and consensus in measurement protocols and techniques. For instance, clinical assessment procedures and current normative values would have to be revised considering gender and vowel. Thus, future research might establish the validity and potential of clinical acoustic assessments.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
51 citations in Web of Science®
62 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Surgery
Health Sciences > Otorhinolaryngology
Language:English
Date:June 2011
Deposited On:14 Dec 2011 10:03
Last Modified:06 Nov 2023 02:41
Publisher:Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins
ISSN:1068-9508
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834575fe
PubMed ID:21483265
Full text not available from this repository.