Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Differential growth responses in seedlings of ten species of Dipterocarpaceae to experimental shading and defoliation


Paine, C E Timothy; Stenflo, Martin; Philipson, Christopher D; Saner, Philippe; Bagchi, Robert; Ong, Robert C; Hector, Andy (2012). Differential growth responses in seedlings of ten species of Dipterocarpaceae to experimental shading and defoliation. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 28(4):377-384.

Abstract

The responses of plants to shade and foliar herbivory jointly affect growth rates and community assem- bly. We grew 600 seedlings of ten species of the economically important Dipterocarpaceae in experi- mental gradients of shading (0.3%–47.0% of full sunlight) and defoliation (0, 25%, 50% or 75% of leaf area removed). We assessed stem diameters initially, after 2 and 4 mo, and calculated relative growth rates (RGR) with a linear model. Shading interacted with defoliation, reducing RGR by 21.6% in shaded conditions and 8.9% in well-lit conditions. We tested three hypotheses for interspecific trade-offs in growth responses to shading and defoliation. They could be positively related, because both reduce a plant’s access to carbon, or inversely related because of trade-offs between herbivore resistance and tol- erance. We observed, however, that species varied in their response to shading, but not defoliation, pre- cluding an interspecific trade-off and suggesting that plants tolerate shade and herbivory with differing strategies. Shading most strongly reduced the growth of species with less-dense wood and larger seeds. The strong and variable growth responses to shade, contrasted with the weak and uniform responses to defoliation, suggest that variation in light availability more strongly affects the growth of tropical tree seedlings, and thus community assembly, than does variation in herbivory.

Abstract

The responses of plants to shade and foliar herbivory jointly affect growth rates and community assem- bly. We grew 600 seedlings of ten species of the economically important Dipterocarpaceae in experi- mental gradients of shading (0.3%–47.0% of full sunlight) and defoliation (0, 25%, 50% or 75% of leaf area removed). We assessed stem diameters initially, after 2 and 4 mo, and calculated relative growth rates (RGR) with a linear model. Shading interacted with defoliation, reducing RGR by 21.6% in shaded conditions and 8.9% in well-lit conditions. We tested three hypotheses for interspecific trade-offs in growth responses to shading and defoliation. They could be positively related, because both reduce a plant’s access to carbon, or inversely related because of trade-offs between herbivore resistance and tol- erance. We observed, however, that species varied in their response to shading, but not defoliation, pre- cluding an interspecific trade-off and suggesting that plants tolerate shade and herbivory with differing strategies. Shading most strongly reduced the growth of species with less-dense wood and larger seeds. The strong and variable growth responses to shade, contrasted with the weak and uniform responses to defoliation, suggest that variation in light availability more strongly affects the growth of tropical tree seedlings, and thus community assembly, than does variation in herbivory.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
16 citations in Web of Science®
15 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

138 downloads since deposited on 10 Jul 2012
21 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Scopus Subject Areas:Life Sciences > Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Uncontrolled Keywords:allocation trade-offs, defence, Dipterocarpaceae, herbivory, relative growth rate, Sabah, shade tolerance
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:10 Jul 2012 09:02
Last Modified:23 Jan 2022 22:04
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:0266-4674
Additional Information:Copyright: Cambridge University Press.
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467412000326
  • Content: Published Version