Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Influence of experimental venue on phenotype: multiple traits reveal multiple answers


Winkler, Jasmin D; Van Buskirk, Josh (2012). Influence of experimental venue on phenotype: multiple traits reveal multiple answers. Functional Ecology, 26(2):513-521.

Abstract

1. Experiments in ecology occur in the laboratory, mesocosm, or field. The choice of venue can influence the outcome and may be associated with trade-offs involving realism and precision.
2. We evaluated these trade-offs in an experiment measuring effects of venue on larval traits of Rana temporaria tadpoles. The design included lab, mesocosm, and field venues, crossed with two treatments (presence and absence of caged Anax imperator dragonfly larvae). Realism of venues was evaluated by comparing experimental with wild tadpoles.
3. Venue influenced nearly every trait we measured, but some were more sensitive to venue than others. Larval and metamorphic performance, external morphology, and predator-induced plasticity in many traits varied among venues, while behavior was less dependent on venue. Tadpoles in mesocosms were most similar to those in field enclosures and the wild, although the phenotypic response to predation risk was greatest in the mesocosm venue. The laboratory environment triggered highly distinctive morphology. Precision was not higher in the laboratory than in other venues.
4. This study suggests that both constraints and research questions must be considered when choosing an appropriate experimental venue.

Abstract

1. Experiments in ecology occur in the laboratory, mesocosm, or field. The choice of venue can influence the outcome and may be associated with trade-offs involving realism and precision.
2. We evaluated these trade-offs in an experiment measuring effects of venue on larval traits of Rana temporaria tadpoles. The design included lab, mesocosm, and field venues, crossed with two treatments (presence and absence of caged Anax imperator dragonfly larvae). Realism of venues was evaluated by comparing experimental with wild tadpoles.
3. Venue influenced nearly every trait we measured, but some were more sensitive to venue than others. Larval and metamorphic performance, external morphology, and predator-induced plasticity in many traits varied among venues, while behavior was less dependent on venue. Tadpoles in mesocosms were most similar to those in field enclosures and the wild, although the phenotypic response to predation risk was greatest in the mesocosm venue. The laboratory environment triggered highly distinctive morphology. Precision was not higher in the laboratory than in other venues.
4. This study suggests that both constraints and research questions must be considered when choosing an appropriate experimental venue.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
25 citations in Web of Science®
24 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

80 downloads since deposited on 12 Sep 2012
6 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Scopus Subject Areas:Life Sciences > Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:12 Sep 2012 09:07
Last Modified:31 May 2022 06:54
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0269-8463
Funders:Swiss National Science Foundation
Additional Information:Author Posting. © The Authors 2012. The full text of this article is published in Functional Ecology, 26(2):513-521. It is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01965.x
OA Status:Hybrid
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01965.x
Project Information:
  • : FunderSNSF
  • : Grant ID
  • : Project TitleSwiss National Science Foundation