Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Measurement bias detection through factor analysis


Barendse, M T; Oort, F J; Werner, Christina S; Ligtvoet, R; Schermelleh-Engel, K (2012). Measurement bias detection through factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(4):561-579.

Abstract

Measurement bias is defined as a violation of measurement invariance, which can be investigated through multigroup factor analysis (MGFA), by testing across-group differences in intercepts (uniform bias) and factor loadings (nonuniform bias). Restricted factor analysis (RFA) can also be used to detect measurement bias. To also enable nonuniform bias detection, we extend RFA with latent moderated structures (LMS) or use a random slope parameterization (RSP). In a simulation study we compare the MGFA, RFA/LMS, and RFA/RSP methods in detecting measurement bias, varying type of bias (uniform, nonuniform), type of the variable that violates measurement invariance (dichotomous, continuous), and its relationship with the trait that we want to measure (independent, dependent). For each condition, 500 sets of data are generated and analyzed with each of the three detection methods, in single run and in an iterative procedure. The RFA methods outperform MGFA when the violating variable is continuous.

Abstract

Measurement bias is defined as a violation of measurement invariance, which can be investigated through multigroup factor analysis (MGFA), by testing across-group differences in intercepts (uniform bias) and factor loadings (nonuniform bias). Restricted factor analysis (RFA) can also be used to detect measurement bias. To also enable nonuniform bias detection, we extend RFA with latent moderated structures (LMS) or use a random slope parameterization (RSP). In a simulation study we compare the MGFA, RFA/LMS, and RFA/RSP methods in detecting measurement bias, varying type of bias (uniform, nonuniform), type of the variable that violates measurement invariance (dichotomous, continuous), and its relationship with the trait that we want to measure (independent, dependent). For each condition, 500 sets of data are generated and analyzed with each of the three detection methods, in single run and in an iterative procedure. The RFA methods outperform MGFA when the violating variable is continuous.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
25 citations in Web of Science®
25 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 07 Nov 2012
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > General Decision Sciences
Physical Sciences > Modeling and Simulation
Social Sciences & Humanities > Sociology and Political Science
Social Sciences & Humanities > General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:07 Nov 2012 15:50
Last Modified:08 Dec 2023 02:44
Publisher:Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN:1070-5511
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.713261