Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Retrospective analysis of outcome data with regards to the use of Phisio(R)-, Bioline(R)- or Softline(R)-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in cardiac surgery


Reser, D; Seifert, Burkhardt; Klein, M; Dreizler, T; Hasenclever, P; Falk, V; Starck, C (2012). Retrospective analysis of outcome data with regards to the use of Phisio(R)-, Bioline(R)- or Softline(R)-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in cardiac surgery. Perfusion, 27(6):530-534.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with various coatings designed to reduce the inflammatory response and to provide better hemocompatibility are available. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of phosphorylcholine-coated, albumin-heparin-coated and synthetic polymer-coated perfusion tubing systems on patient outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective database review of elective patients between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2010. Demographics, preoperative, operative, postoperative data and follow-up were collected and statistically analysed. RESULTS: We identified 201 patients and formed three groups: Group 1 with phosphorylcholine coating (n=133), Group 2 with albumin-heparin coating (n=32) and Group 3 synthetic polymer coating (n=36). Mean age was 68±11years, additive Euroscore 5.8±2.7. In-hospital outcomes were comparable between the groups without statistically significant differences. The overall 30-day and 1-year late survival were 98.5% and 96.7±1.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that in-hospital and follow-up outcomes are comparable in cardiac surgery patients after using either phosphorylcholine-coated, albumin-heparin-coated or synthetic polymer-coated circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with various coatings designed to reduce the inflammatory response and to provide better hemocompatibility are available. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of phosphorylcholine-coated, albumin-heparin-coated and synthetic polymer-coated perfusion tubing systems on patient outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective database review of elective patients between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2010. Demographics, preoperative, operative, postoperative data and follow-up were collected and statistically analysed. RESULTS: We identified 201 patients and formed three groups: Group 1 with phosphorylcholine coating (n=133), Group 2 with albumin-heparin coating (n=32) and Group 3 synthetic polymer coating (n=36). Mean age was 68±11years, additive Euroscore 5.8±2.7. In-hospital outcomes were comparable between the groups without statistically significant differences. The overall 30-day and 1-year late survival were 98.5% and 96.7±1.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that in-hospital and follow-up outcomes are comparable in cardiac surgery patients after using either phosphorylcholine-coated, albumin-heparin-coated or synthetic polymer-coated circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
11 citations in Web of Science®
14 citations in Scopus®
13 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

105 downloads since deposited on 20 Dec 2012
19 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:20 Dec 2012 13:33
Last Modified:17 Feb 2018 00:26
Publisher:SAGE Publications
ISSN:0267-6591
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659112454558
PubMed ID:22864552

Download

Download PDF  'Retrospective analysis of outcome data with regards to the use of Phisio(R)-, Bioline(R)- or Softline(R)-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in cardiac surgery'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 1MB
View at publisher