Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Correlation between therapy response assessment using FDG PET/CT and histopathologic tumor regression grade in hepatic metastasis of colorectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy


Burger, Irene A; Schwarz, Esther I; Samarin, Andrei; Breitenstein, Stefan; Weber, Achim; Hany, Thomas F (2013). Correlation between therapy response assessment using FDG PET/CT and histopathologic tumor regression grade in hepatic metastasis of colorectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 27(2):177-183.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between change in FDG uptake before and after chemotherapy in hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma (HCRC) and a histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG). METHODS: In patients with HCRC, PET/CT data prior to hepatic surgery were retrospectively analyzed under an IRB waiver. The maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) was measured before and after chemotherapy. The relative change of FDG activity in the identified lesions was calculated (dSUV). Histopathological specimens of resected metastases were graded on a 5-score TRG scale. A TRG of 1-3 was rated as a responding to therapy, whereas TRG 4-5 were regarded as non-responding lesions. RESULTS: 31 lesions were identified in 23 patients. Mean SUV(max) before and after therapy was 6.9 ± 3.7 and 3.5 ± 1.8, respectively. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve revealed a conclusive correlation between TRG and dSUV (AUC 0.773; 95 % confidence interval 0.599-0.946) with a cut off at 41 % decrease in FDG activity yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 72 and 75 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: A relative change in FDG activity (dSUV) of more than 41 % decrease correlated significantly with histopathological tumor regression and might be a prognostic tool for response to chemotherapy in HCRC.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between change in FDG uptake before and after chemotherapy in hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma (HCRC) and a histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG). METHODS: In patients with HCRC, PET/CT data prior to hepatic surgery were retrospectively analyzed under an IRB waiver. The maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) was measured before and after chemotherapy. The relative change of FDG activity in the identified lesions was calculated (dSUV). Histopathological specimens of resected metastases were graded on a 5-score TRG scale. A TRG of 1-3 was rated as a responding to therapy, whereas TRG 4-5 were regarded as non-responding lesions. RESULTS: 31 lesions were identified in 23 patients. Mean SUV(max) before and after therapy was 6.9 ± 3.7 and 3.5 ± 1.8, respectively. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve revealed a conclusive correlation between TRG and dSUV (AUC 0.773; 95 % confidence interval 0.599-0.946) with a cut off at 41 % decrease in FDG activity yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 72 and 75 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: A relative change in FDG activity (dSUV) of more than 41 % decrease correlated significantly with histopathological tumor regression and might be a prognostic tool for response to chemotherapy in HCRC.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
11 citations in Web of Science®
12 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

72 downloads since deposited on 29 Dec 2012
11 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Nuclear Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Language:English
Date:2013
Deposited On:29 Dec 2012 12:23
Last Modified:08 Nov 2023 02:46
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0914-7187
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0670-8
PubMed ID:23233085