Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Diversity beliefs as moderator of the contact–prejudice relationship

Adesokan, Adekemi A; Ullrich, Johannes; van Dick, Rolf; Tropp, Linda R (2011). Diversity beliefs as moderator of the contact–prejudice relationship. Social Psychology, 42(4):271-278.

Abstract

Research on intergroup contact has recently begun to examine how individual differences moderate the reduction of prejudice. We extend this work by examining the moderating role of diversity beliefs, i.e., the strength of individuals’ beliefs that society benefits from ethnic diversity. Results of a survey among 255 university students in the United States show that the relationship between contact and reduced prejudice is stronger for individuals holding less favorable diversity beliefs compared to those with more positive diversity beliefs. Likewise, the relationship between contact and perceived importance of contact is stronger for people with less favorable diversity beliefs. Together with previously reported moderator effects, these results suggest that contact especially benefits people who are the most predisposed to being prejudiced.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Social Psychology
Social Sciences & Humanities > Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences & Humanities > Sociology and Political Science
Social Sciences & Humanities > General Psychology
Uncontrolled Keywords:Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Sociology and Political Science, General Psychology, Social Psychology
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:13 Feb 2013 09:08
Last Modified:09 Sep 2024 01:35
Publisher:Hogrefe Verlag
ISSN:1864-9335
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000058
Full text not available from this repository.

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
38 citations in Web of Science®
37 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications