Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not

Ullrich, Johannes; Christ, Oliver; van Dick, Rolf (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1):235-44.

Abstract

This article extends research on leader procedural fairness as well as the social identity model of leadership effectiveness (SIMOL) by demonstrating that leader prototypicality can act as a substitute for procedural fairness. Although procedural fairness in general and voice in particular have been found to have a robust positive influence on leader endorsement, the authors showed in an experimental scenario study and a correlational field study that the influence of voice on leader endorsement is substantially reduced when leaders are perceived as prototypical for the group that they lead and followers are highly identified with their group. Additionally, supportive of predictions of the SIMOL, leader prototypicality interacted with follower identification in predicting leader endorsement, such that prototypicality had a positive effect on leader endorsement, which was enhanced among high identifiers. Overall, these results suggest that leaders who are attuned to their followers' group identity can afford to go it alone, for the better or the worse. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Applied Psychology
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:15 Feb 2013 15:28
Last Modified:09 Sep 2024 01:36
Publisher:American Psychological Association
ISSN:0021-9010
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012936
PubMed ID:19186908
Full text not available from this repository.

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
114 citations in Web of Science®
124 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications