Langkau, Julia (2013). The method of reflective equilibrium and intuitions. In: Hoeltje, Miguel; Spitzley, Thomas; Spohn, Wolfgang. Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? - Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. Duisburg-Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen, 352-364.
Reflective equilibrium has been considered a paradigm method involving intuitions. Some philosophers have recently claimed that it is trivial and can even accommodate the sort of scepticism about the reliability of intuitions advocated by experimental philosophers. I discuss several ways in which reflective equilibrium could be thought of as trivial and argue that it is inconsistent with scepticism about the reliability of intuitions.
Reflective equilibrium has been considered a paradigm method involving intuitions. Some philosophers have recently claimed that it is trivial and can even accommodate the sort of scepticism about the reliability of intuitions advocated by experimental philosophers. I discuss several ways in which reflective equilibrium could be thought of as trivial and argue that it is inconsistent with scepticism about the reliability of intuitions.
| Item Type: | Book Section, refereed, original work |
|---|---|
| Communities & Collections: | 06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Philosophy |
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 100 Philosophy |
| Language: | English |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Deposited On: | 19 Jul 2013 07:18 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Aug 2021 15:34 |
| Publisher: | Universität Duisburg-Essen |
| ISBN: | 978-3-00-042332-1 |
| OA Status: | Green |
| Official URL: | http://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=31200 |
| Related URLs: | http://www.gap-im-netz.de/ |
Langkau, Julia