Friston, Karl; Daunizeau, Jean; Stephan, Klaas Enno (2013). Model selection and gobbledygook: Response to Lohmann et al. NeuroImage, 75:275-278.
Lohmann et al. (in the same issue) make three unremarkable observations about model selection and use them to critique dynamic causal modelling—a Bayesian model selection procedure based on causal models of dynamical systems (Marreiros et al., 2010). In this response, we unpack their misconceptions and try to answer their questions.
Lohmann et al. (in the same issue) make three unremarkable observations about model selection and use them to critique dynamic causal modelling—a Bayesian model selection procedure based on causal models of dynamical systems (Marreiros et al., 2010). In this response, we unpack their misconceptions and try to answer their questions.
| Item Type: | Journal Article, refereed, original work |
|---|---|
| Communities & Collections: | 04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Engineering |
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 170 Ethics
610 Medicine & health |
| Scopus Subject Areas: | Life Sciences > Neurology
Life Sciences > Cognitive Neuroscience |
| Language: | English |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Deposited On: | 03 Sep 2013 11:45 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Jan 2022 01:27 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 1053-8119 |
| OA Status: | Closed |
| Publisher DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.064 |
Friston, Karl