Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Automated pure-tone threshold estimations from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions


Schmuziger, N; Patscheke, J; Probst, R (2006). Automated pure-tone threshold estimations from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4):1937-1939.

Abstract

A promising approach to the prediction of pure-tone thresholds through the estimation of DPOAE thresholds by input/output functions was recently published by Boege and Janssen [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810-1818 (2002)]. On the basis of their results, a device that enables automated measurements of these thresholds was recently developed. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability of this instrument for the objective assessment of hearing loss in 101 ears with either normal hearing or with cochlear hearing loss of up to 50 dB HL. The median difference between pure-tone hearing and DPOAE thresholds was approximately 2 dB. For individual subjects, however, DPOAE thresholds differed from pure-tone thresholds by up to 40 dB. We find, therefore, that the clinical benefits of this method are probably limited.

Abstract

A promising approach to the prediction of pure-tone thresholds through the estimation of DPOAE thresholds by input/output functions was recently published by Boege and Janssen [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810-1818 (2002)]. On the basis of their results, a device that enables automated measurements of these thresholds was recently developed. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability of this instrument for the objective assessment of hearing loss in 101 ears with either normal hearing or with cochlear hearing loss of up to 50 dB HL. The median difference between pure-tone hearing and DPOAE thresholds was approximately 2 dB. For individual subjects, however, DPOAE thresholds differed from pure-tone thresholds by up to 40 dB. We find, therefore, that the clinical benefits of this method are probably limited.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
11 citations in Web of Science®
9 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

126 downloads since deposited on 30 Mar 2009
17 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Physical Sciences > Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Language:English
Date:2006
Deposited On:30 Mar 2009 10:18
Last Modified:21 Jan 2022 14:19
Publisher:Acoustical Society of America
ISSN:0001-4966
OA Status:Green
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2180531
PubMed ID:16642804
  • Content: Published Version