Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-25785
Zimmermann, T; Nagappan, N; Gall, H C; Giger, E; Murphy, B (2009). Cross-project defect prediction: a large scale experiment on data vs. domain vs. process. In: 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24 August 2009 - 28 August 2009, 91-100.
Prediction of software defects works well within projects as long as there is a sufficient amount of data available to train any models. However, this is rarely the case for new software projects and for many companies. So far, only a few have studies focused on transferring prediction models from one project to another. In this paper, we study cross-project defect prediction models on a large scale. For 12 real-world applications, we ran 622 cross-project predictions. Our results indicate that cross-project prediction is a serious challenge, i.e., simply using models from projects in the same domain or with the same process does not lead to accurate predictions. To help software engineers choose models wisely, we identified factors that do influence the success of cross-project predictions. We also derived decision trees that can provide early estimates for precision, recall, and accuracy before a prediction is attempted.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Paper), refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Informatics|
|DDC:||000 Computer science, knowledge & systems|
|Event End Date:||28 August 2009|
|Deposited On:||11 Feb 2010 03:15|
|Last Modified:||27 Nov 2013 21:00|
|Citations:||Web of Science®|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page