Publication: Comparison of requirements hand-off, analysis, and negotiation: case study
Comparison of requirements hand-off, analysis, and negotiation: case study
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Fricker, S., & Glinz, M. (2010). Comparison of requirements hand-off, analysis, and negotiation: case study. Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2010 18th IEEE International, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2010.29
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Companies in the software business often distribute requirements engineering responsibilities over several roles. Product management has overall product responsibility and performs early-phase market-driven requirements engineering. Product development implements the product and performs late-phase solution-oriented requirements engineering. Such shared responsibility provides advantages in the utilization of specific knowledge, skills, and resources, but leads to problems of mutual understanding and coordination. Earlier research pro
Metrics
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Event Title
Event Title
Event Title
Event Location
Event Location
Event Location
Event Country
Event Country
Event Country
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Scope
Scope
Scope
Language
Language
Language
Date available
Date available
Date available
Series Name
Series Name
Series Name
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
Additional Information
Additional Information
Additional Information
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Metrics
Citations
Fricker, S., & Glinz, M. (2010). Comparison of requirements hand-off, analysis, and negotiation: case study. Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2010 18th IEEE International, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2010.29