Publication: A Broad-Coverage, Representationally Minimalist LFG Parser: Chunks and F-Structures Are Enough
A Broad-Coverage, Representationally Minimalist LFG Parser: Chunks and F-Structures Are Enough
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Schneider, G. (2005, July 20). A Broad-Coverage, Representationally Minimalist LFG Parser: Chunks and F-Structures Are Enough. LFG05, Bergen. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/10/lfg05schneider.pdf
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
A major reason why LFG employs c-structure is because it is context-free. According to Tree-Adjoining Grammar (TAG), the only context-sensitive operation that is needed to express natural language is Adjoining, from which LFG functional uncertainty has been shown to follow. Functional uncertainty, which is expressed on the level of f-structure, would then be the only extension needed to an otherwise context-free processing of natural language. We suggest that if f-structures can be derived context-freely, full-fledged c-structures are
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Event Title
Event Title
Event Title
Event Location
Event Location
Event Location
Event Country
Event Country
Event Country
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Citations
Schneider, G. (2005, July 20). A Broad-Coverage, Representationally Minimalist LFG Parser: Chunks and F-Structures Are Enough. LFG05, Bergen. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/10/lfg05schneider.pdf