Publication: Decisions against preferences
Decisions against preferences
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Messerli, M., & Reuter, K. (2019). Decisions against preferences. 2345–2350. https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/past-conferences/
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
An agent decides against her preferences, if she considers an option x better than another option y but nevertheless decides to do y. A central tenet of rational choice theory states that individuals do not decide against their preferences, whereby we find two kinds of potential counterexamples in the literature: akrasia, also known as weak-willed decisions, and decisions based on so-called deontic constraints such as obligations or commitments. While there is some empirical evidence that weak-willed choices are a real phenomenon, lea
Metrics
Citations
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Event Title
Event Title
Event Title
Event Location
Event Location
Event Location
Event Country
Event Country
Event Country
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Publisher
Publisher
Publisher
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Date available
Date available
Date available
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Metrics
Citations
Citations
Messerli, M., & Reuter, K. (2019). Decisions against preferences. 2345–2350. https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/past-conferences/
