Publication: Existential risk narratives about AI do not distract from its immediate harms
Existential risk narratives about AI do not distract from its immediate harms
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Hoes, E., & Gilardi, F. (2025). Existential risk narratives about AI do not distract from its immediate harms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122, e2419055122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419055122
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
There is broad consensus that AI presents risks, but considerable disagreement about the nature of those risks. These differing viewpoints can be understood as distinct narratives, each offering a specific interpretation of AI’s potential dangers. One narrative focuses on doomsday predictions of AI posing long-term existential risks for humanity. Another narrative prioritizes immediate concerns that AI brings to society today, such as the reproduction of biases embedded into AI systems. A significant point of contention is that the “e
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Hoes, Emma
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Citations
Hoes, E., & Gilardi, F. (2025). Existential risk narratives about AI do not distract from its immediate harms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122, e2419055122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419055122
