Publication: Differential object marking in French: Myth or reality
Differential object marking in French: Myth or reality
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Binder, L., & Stark, E. (2023). Differential object marking in French: Myth or reality. In M. A. Irimia & A. Mardale (Eds.), Differential Object Marking in Romance : Towards microvariation (No. 280; Issue 280, pp. 56–84). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.280.03bin
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
This study is dedicated to the question whether French possesses (optional) DOM, i.e. direct object marking, which it answers in a negative way. French is traditionally considered to lack a differential marker for the direct object (cf. e.g. Körner, 1987). However, Fagard and Mardale (2014) claim in their large corpus study (12–13 billion tokens) that differential object marking (DOM) is an optional phenomenon in some non-standard varieties of French. Our data, stemming from an acceptability study plus a corpus analysis, do not confir
Metrics
Views
Citations
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Editors
Title of Book
Title of Book
Title of Book
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
Series Name
Series Name
Series Name
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Citations
Binder, L., & Stark, E. (2023). Differential object marking in French: Myth or reality. In M. A. Irimia & A. Mardale (Eds.), Differential Object Marking in Romance : Towards microvariation (No. 280; Issue 280, pp. 56–84). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.280.03bin