Publication: Grammaticalization, distance, immediacy and discourse traditions: The case of Portuguese caso
Grammaticalization, distance, immediacy and discourse traditions: The case of Portuguese caso
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Kabatek, J., & Gerards, D. P. (2018). Grammaticalization, distance, immediacy and discourse traditions: The case of Portuguese caso. In S. Pons Bordería & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers. New Studies in Language Change (No. 18; pp. 115–159). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375420
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates the emergence and evolution of Portuguese caso (< Lat. CASUS) in conditional contexts. As in similar cases in other European languages, conditional constructions involving caso emerged in medieval language in juridical texts. The paper examines the first attestations of such constructions and shows how they allow the further evolution of caso in Portuguese into a conditional conjunction. This evolution can be initially identified in Brazilian Portuguese from where it possibly spread to the European variety. Oth
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Editors
Title of Book
Title of Book
Title of Book
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Kabatek, J., & Gerards, D. P. (2018). Grammaticalization, distance, immediacy and discourse traditions: The case of Portuguese caso. In S. Pons Bordería & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers. New Studies in Language Change (No. 18; pp. 115–159). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375420