Publication: Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial
Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Andersen, B. K., Sejr-Hansen, M., Westra, J., Campo, G., Efterkhari, A., Tu, S., Escaned, J., Koltowski, L., Stähli, B. E., Erglis, A., Jaruševičius, G., Žiubrytė, G., Råmunddal, T., Liu, T., Wijns, W., Landmesser, U., Maillard, L., Matsuo, H., Christiansen, E. H., & Holm, N. R. (2023). Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial. EuroIntervention, 18(16), e1358–e1364. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00214
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on invasive coronary angiographic images. Calculating QFR is less invasive than measuring FFR and may be associated with lower costs. Current evidence supports the call for an adequately powered randomised comparison of QFR and FFR for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis. The aim of the FAVOR III Europe Japan trial is to investigate if a QFR-based diagnostic strategy yields a non-inferior 12-month clinical outcome compared with a standar
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Andersen, B. K., Sejr-Hansen, M., Westra, J., Campo, G., Efterkhari, A., Tu, S., Escaned, J., Koltowski, L., Stähli, B. E., Erglis, A., Jaruševičius, G., Žiubrytė, G., Råmunddal, T., Liu, T., Wijns, W., Landmesser, U., Maillard, L., Matsuo, H., Christiansen, E. H., & Holm, N. R. (2023). Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial. EuroIntervention, 18(16), e1358–e1364. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00214