Publication: Towards the Embodied Conversational Interview Agentic Service ELIAS: Development and Evaluation of a First Prototype
Towards the Embodied Conversational Interview Agentic Service ELIAS: Development and Evaluation of a First Prototype
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Budig, T., Nißen, M., & Kowatsch, T. (2025). Towards the Embodied Conversational Interview Agentic Service ELIAS: Development and Evaluation of a First Prototype. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3708319.3733810
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Interviews in social and health sciences are resource intensive and susceptible to interviewer bias, inconsistency, and variability across interviewers. Moreover, human-led interviews may inhibit participant openness, especially regarding sensitive topics, due to judgment, compromised anonymity, or discomfort in face-to-face interactions. These shortcomings limit the quality of the data collected. To this end, we propose the Embodied Conversational Interview Agentic Service (ELIAS). Informed by human-developed interview guides, ELIAS
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Event Title
Event Title
Event Title
Event Location
Event Location
Event Location
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event Start Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Event End Date
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Date available
Date available
Date available
Series Name
Series Name
Series Name
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Budig, T., Nißen, M., & Kowatsch, T. (2025). Towards the Embodied Conversational Interview Agentic Service ELIAS: Development and Evaluation of a First Prototype. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3708319.3733810
