Publication: Reevaluating Benefits in the Moral Justification of Animal Research: A Comment on “Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research”
Reevaluating Benefits in the Moral Justification of Animal Research: A Comment on “Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research”
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Eggel, M., Neuhaus, C. P., & Grimm, H. (2020). Reevaluating Benefits in the Moral Justification of Animal Research: A Comment on “Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180119000860
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
In a recent paper in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics on the necessary conditions for morally responsible animal research David DeGrazia and Jeff Sebo claim that the key requirements for morally responsible animal research are (1) an assertion of sufficient net benefit, (2) a worthwhile-life condition, and (3) a no-unnecessary-harm condition. With regards to the assertion (or expectation) of sufficient net benefit (ASNB), the authors claim that morally responsible research offers unique benefits to humans that outweigh the cos
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Neuhaus, Carolyn P
- Grimm, Herwig
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Eggel, M., Neuhaus, C. P., & Grimm, H. (2020). Reevaluating Benefits in the Moral Justification of Animal Research: A Comment on “Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180119000860