Publication: Logic and conventions
Logic and conventions
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Büttner, K. M., & Glock, H. (2024). Logic and conventions. Philosophical Investigations, 47(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12437
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Wittgenstein and the logical positivists attempted to explain logical necessity in terms of linguistic conventions. It is often thought that their respective accounts have been conclusively refuted by objections from Quine, Dummett and others. We argue that this verdict is premature. Several of the most popular anti‐conventionalist arguments fail, partly because they misconstrue the idea of truth by convention in Wittgenstein and/or logical positivism. Correctly understood, conventionalism claims that, given certain linguistic convent
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Büttner, Kai Michael
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Citations
Büttner, K. M., & Glock, H. (2024). Logic and conventions. Philosophical Investigations, 47(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12437
