Publication: Relative complexity in scientific discourse
Relative complexity in scientific discourse
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Hundt, M., Denison, D., & Schneider, G. (2012). Relative complexity in scientific discourse. English Language and Linguistics, 16(2), 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674312000032
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Variation and change in relativization strategies are well documented. Previous studies have looked at issues such as (a) relativizer choice with respect to the semantics of the antecedent and type of relative, (b) prescriptive traditions, (c) variation across text types and regional varieties, and (d) the role that relative clauses play in the organization of information within the noun phrase. In this article, our focus is on scientific writing in British and American English. The addition of American scientific texts to the ARCHER
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
Additional Information
Additional Information
Additional Information
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Citations
Hundt, M., Denison, D., & Schneider, G. (2012). Relative complexity in scientific discourse. English Language and Linguistics, 16(2), 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674312000032