Publication: The consequential conception of doxastic responsibility
The consequential conception of doxastic responsibility
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Meylan, A. (2017). The consequential conception of doxastic responsibility. Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, 83(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12110
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
We are occasionally responsible for our beliefs. But is this doxastic responsibility analogous to any non‐attitudinal form of responsibility? What I shall call the consequential conception of doxastic responsibility holds that the kind of responsibility that we have for our beliefs is indeed analogous to the kind of responsibility that we have for the consequences of our actions. This article does two things, both with the aim of defending this somewhat unsophisticated but intuitive view of doxastic responsibility. First, it emphasize
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Meylan, A. (2017). The consequential conception of doxastic responsibility. Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, 83(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12110