Publication: Parental education and public reason: why comprehensive enrolment is justified
Parental education and public reason: why comprehensive enrolment is justified
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Giesinger, J. (2013). Parental education and public reason: why comprehensive enrolment is justified. Theory and Research in Education, 11(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513498177
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Matthew Clayton claims that ‘comprehensive enrolment’ – raising one’s children in accordance with one’s own conception of the good – is illegitimate. In his argument against comprehensive enrolment, Clayton refers to Rawls’s idea of public reason. In a recent response to Clayton, Christina Cameron not only rejects Clayton’s conclusions, but also denies that the idea of public reason can be applied to the parent–child relationship. This article responds to both Clayton and Cameron: It is stated, first, that political arrangements conce
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Giesinger, Johannes
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page Range
Page Range
Page Range
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Giesinger, J. (2013). Parental education and public reason: why comprehensive enrolment is justified. Theory and Research in Education, 11(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513498177
