Publication: To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures
To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Jeanneret, S., Bartsch, L. M., & Vergauwe, E. (2023). To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(5), 1486–1498. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02706-4
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Priority-based allocation of attentional resources has shown robust effects in working memory (WM) with both cue-based and reward-based prioritization. However, direct comparisons between these effects in WM are needed. Additionally, the consequences of WM prioritization for remembering in the long term remain unclear for both prioritization procedures. Here, we tested and compared the immediate and long-term memory (LTM) effects of cue-based versus reward-based retrospective prioritization of WM content. Participants encoded four mem
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Jeanneret, S., Bartsch, L. M., & Vergauwe, E. (2023). To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(5), 1486–1498. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02706-4