Publication: Violations of coalescing in parametric utility measurement
Violations of coalescing in parametric utility measurement
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Glöckner, A., Renerte, B., & Schmidt, U. (2020). Violations of coalescing in parametric utility measurement. Theory and Decision, 89, 471–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-020-09761-5
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
The majority consensus in the empirical literature is that probability weighting functions are typically inverse-S shaped, that is, people tend to overweight small and underweight large probabilities. A separate stream of literature has reported event-splitting effects (also called violations of coalescing) and shown that they can explain violations of expected utility. This leads to the questions whether (1) the observed shape of weighting functions is a mere consequence of the coalesced presentation and, more generally, whether (2)
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Scope
Scope
Scope
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Citations
Glöckner, A., Renerte, B., & Schmidt, U. (2020). Violations of coalescing in parametric utility measurement. Theory and Decision, 89, 471–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-020-09761-5