Publication: Optionality in animal communication: a novel framework for examining the evolution of arbitrariness
Optionality in animal communication: a novel framework for examining the evolution of arbitrariness
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Watson, S. K., Filippi, P., Gasparri, L., Falk, N., Tamer, N., Widmer, P., Manser, M., & Glock, H. (2022). Optionality in animal communication: a novel framework for examining the evolution of arbitrariness. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 97(6), 2057–2075. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12882
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
A critical feature of language is that the form of words need not bear any perceptual similarity to their function – these relationships can be ‘arbitrary’. The capacity to process these arbitrary form–function associations facilitates the enormous expressive power of language. However, the evolutionary roots of our capacity for arbitrariness, i.e. the extent to which related abilities may be shared with animals, is largely unexamined. We argue this is due to the challenges of applying such an intrinsically linguistic concept to anima
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Watson, S. K., Filippi, P., Gasparri, L., Falk, N., Tamer, N., Widmer, P., Manser, M., & Glock, H. (2022). Optionality in animal communication: a novel framework for examining the evolution of arbitrariness. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 97(6), 2057–2075. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12882