Publication: Why a "word order difference" is not always a "word order" difference: a reply to Weyerts, Penke, Münte, Heinze, and Clahsen.
Why a "word order difference" is not always a "word order" difference: a reply to Weyerts, Penke, Münte, Heinze, and Clahsen.
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., & Meyer, M. (2002). Why a “word order difference” is not always a “word order” difference: a reply to Weyerts, Penke, Münte, Heinze, and Clahsen. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021209818415
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
We present evidence that the supposed processing advantage for an SVfinO word order over an SOVfin word order in German argued for by Weyerts, Penke, Münte, Heinze, and Clahsen (2002) is supported by neither experimental nor theoretical evidence. Specifically, we show (a) that the frontocentral negativity for an SOVfin in comparison to an SVfinO word order in Weyerts et al.'s Experiments 2 and 3 is reducible to more general differences in the electrophysiological responses elicited by nouns versus verbs in a sentence context, and (b)
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Schlesewsky, Matthias
- Bornkessel, Ina
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., & Meyer, M. (2002). Why a “word order difference” is not always a “word order” difference: a reply to Weyerts, Penke, Münte, Heinze, and Clahsen. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021209818415