Publication: Epistemic blame and the normativity of evidence
Epistemic blame and the normativity of evidence
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Schmidt, S. (2024). Epistemic blame and the normativity of evidence. Erkenntnis, 89, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00430-9
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
The normative force of evidence can seem puzzling. It seems that having conclusive evidence for a proposition does not, by itself, make it true that one ought to believe the proposition. But spelling out the condition that evidence must meet in order to provide us with genuine normative reasons for belief seems to lead us into a dilemma: the condition either fails to explain the normative significance of epistemic reasons or it renders the content of epistemic norms practical. The first aim of this paper is to spell out this challenge
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Page Range
Page Range
Page Range
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Citations
Schmidt, S. (2024). Epistemic blame and the normativity of evidence. Erkenntnis, 89, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00430-9